CLEAN FLICKS SUES TO KEEP EDITING MOVIES

BY JOSEPH HADFIELD / Sept 4, 2002
Brigham Young University’s Daily Universe

A Clean Flicks franchise is suing 16 renowned directors over the right to remove sex, profanity and violence from movies for rent or sale. But the action could turn against them.

The suit, filed Aug. 30 by a Colorado franchise of Clean Flicks, asks the courts to rule their editing practices do not violate copyright laws. But the president of the Utah-based company, John Dixon, said fighting filmmakers in court is not the best approach for the business. "Those guys are big, the best thing to do is to sit down and go over this with them," said John Dixon. "A lawsuit isn't the way to go."

Representatives from the Directors Guild of America said they are confident they will win in court. "Obviously, we think they are violating copyright law," said Andrew Levy, special assignments executive for the Guild. "They are taking an artistic work, the efforts of a lot of creative people, and changing it on their whims."

Clean Flicks is headquartered in Pleasant Grove and has 36 Utah stores. If the court rules against Clean Flicks, all franchises could be forced to stop editing films. "Our whole plan was to work with Hollywood on this," Dixon said.

The business has found regular customers at BYU, where student housing guidelines do not permit viewing of indecent material. "If they could see the kind of market we see," Dixon said. "The public wants edited movies, or even just clean movies."

One such customer is BYU senior Dave Baer, who has been a member of Clean Flicks for eight months. "Artistic freedom can go too far," said Baer, a 23-year old neurobiology major from Littleton, Colorado. "They are too caught up in their freedom rather than in making a better society."

One movie Clean Flicks edited and rents is Saving Private Ryan, a film depicting fighting in World War II. Levy said the removed parts are critical to the film. "The whole purpose is to show the horror of the Normandy landing," Levy said. "To sanitize it, is to me abhorrent."

The most surprising part of the lawsuit is that it names directors as defendants in the case, Levy said. "Directors do their films, get paid, but at the end of the day, the actual owner of the film is the studio," Levy said.

Dixon said he hopes to negotiate with studios to settle the issue, citing other instances where similar editing is currently allowed. "We want to say, 'Hey, you already do it for airlines, television and third world countries with strong religious beliefs,'" Dixon said.

When films are edited for airlines, Levy said, they are often done with the input of the director. "There is a difference between authorized editing and unauthorized editing," Levy said. "Whether the studios want to start marketing those airline videos is up to them."